13
Leadership meetings reach decisions all the time and rarely mark them. A one-sentence close by the decider, repeated back by someone else, turns an impression into a fact.
Istanbul — San Francisco
Notes
13
Leadership meetings reach decisions all the time and rarely mark them. A one-sentence close by the decider, repeated back by someone else, turns an impression into a fact.
14
Where no stop condition was written, a running project can still be judged: forward cost, forward value, and the work it displaces, with evidence from someone other than the sponsor.
15
Proposals describe how a firm sells. The engagement runs on staffing, references and fee structure, and those can be tested before anyone signs.
16
The norm fails when commitment is demanded before the objection is answered. A written dissent, a stated definition of commitment and a review date give it terms that hold.
17
A meeting produces what its design asks of it. One built around decisions, a named decider and an explicit close ends with a choice instead of an hour of talk.
18
Most initiatives are never stopped. They expire. A stop condition with a date, written before the work begins, moves the hardest decision to the moment it costs least.
19
The moment to hire is set by what a company already knows about its constraint, not by how bad the quarter felt. Three conditions can be checked on paper before anyone is called.
20
Most decision rights were never designed. They were inherited from whoever happened to own the first case, and a growing company inherits the wrong owner as often as the right one.
21
A shortlist built from referrals answers who was well liked. It does not answer who can move the constraint the company actually has — and that is the harder, more useful question to spend a week on before calling anyone.
22
Consensus is not the problem. Running it as the decision rule instead of the check is. The method is three lines settled before the meeting, not a better meeting.
23
Most operators use the two words interchangeably. The gap between them is exactly the gap between a meeting that recurs and a meeting that resolves anything, worth naming on its own terms.
24
Cutting the list to three does not end the argument. Three correct priorities that draw on the same team and the same unmade decision still compete, and competition has a different remedy than clutter.